Semantic QC is live — 41% more invalid open-ends caught before they reach your dataRead the method
Solutions
The study types we run most often, each with its own audience structure, template and QC threshold. Copy the whole thing, or borrow one part.
By research type
The same 800 completes means something different for a tracker and a churn study — different people, different length, different threshold for a bad answer. Those differences are pre-configured.
Brand equity, awareness, creative testing and in-market lift. Track the same people across waves and read a trend, not a series of snapshots.
Screen cheap and wide, then validate the winner quantitatively. Spend only where it changes the answer.
Touchpoint diagnosis, churn drivers and tracking. NPS is not the number you collect — it is the open-end behind it.
Attitude plus behaviour clustering you can brief a team with. Not "young mothers" but "shops on the way home, price-sensitive, ingredient-first".
By industry
We do not field one generic questionnaire for everyone. Sector means different screeners, different compliance constraints and a different definition of a good answer.
Launch validation, shelf and promotion response, taste and packaging tests. Product can be shipped to respondents before the study and reviewed afterwards.
Roadmap prioritisation, usability sessions and churn motivation. We recruit genuine power users — and the people who just left you.
Compliance-safe decision-maker sample covering savings, investments, insurance and lending, filterable by assets and risk appetite.
Patients, caregivers and clinicians as three distinct audiences. Anything touching prescription or diagnosis goes through a compliance review before fielding.
Template library
Each one is maintained by a researcher who has run the design fifty times or more. Question order, option sets and open-end placement are all field-tested. Insert it and edit freely — nothing is locked.
18 questions · ~8 min
Use this template12 questions · ~6 min
Use this template15 questions · 2 videos
Use this template8 questions · ~4 min
Use this template10 questions · ~5 min
Use this templateRecruit + 30 min interview
Use this templateHow teams use it
Numbers come from real project debriefs. Client names are withheld by agreement.
CPG
A 400-complete screen, then an 800-complete validation of the top two routes.
Technology
120 churned users recruited within 30 days, quantitative survey plus 20 interviews.
Financial services
Stratified by assets, with PSM sensitivity crossed against acceptance.
Start your first project
$500 in sample credit on your first order. No minimums, no contracts, no platform seat fees. If you would rather have someone run it with you, one of our researchers will field the whole study.
No credit card 14-day refund window Export to SPSS / Excel / CSV
SOLUTIONS FAQ
Not covered here? Email support@pandaopinion.com — you will hear back within two hours during business hours.
Talk to usYes. Send the decision you need to support, the audience and your timeline, and a researcher will send a comparison of two or three designs with sample size, duration and budget. No charge and no obligation to buy.
Quantitative work commonly uses 300–800 valid completes, with at least 80 per sub-group you want to report separately. The more cross-tabs you plan, the larger the base. We can back-solve the sample size from the tables you intend to publish.
Yes. The expert and decision-maker network supports 30–60 minute interviews, and consumers can join online focus groups. Recruitment, incentives, scheduling, recording, transcription and coding can all be handled for you.
Yes — a locked panel keeps 85%+ overlap between waves, or you can field a fresh cross-section each time. We will explain the trade-offs at the design stage, because the two answer different questions.
