Semantic QC is live — 41% more invalid open-ends caught before they reach your dataRead the method

NEW Semantic QC — 41% more bad open-ends stopped

Launch in an hour.
Data you can defend.

Audience sourcing, fielding, cleaning and analysis in one workspace. Brief today, analyse tomorrow — and never pay for a complete you cannot use.

4.9 / 5
Used daily by 320+ research teams
app.pandaopinion.com/scope/PO-2481

Urban commute study · Wave 3

Owned panel + 3 direct suppliers

In field

COMPLETED

1,284/1,600

QUALITY

96.4

CPI

$2.90

Tier-1 cities, 18–3492%
Tier-2 · 60+ min commute78%
EV owners (supplemental)64%

37 completes blocked

Flagged before they bill

6.4h median field time

From launch, not kickoff

Trusted for everyday decisions at

0M+

Completes delivered

Trailing 12 months

0

Markets covered

Sourced locally

0+

Targeting attributes

Dated and refreshable

0h

Median field time

Consumer studies

Built in

Four parts, one project.

Finding the audience, waiting on quotes, chasing fielding and cleaning the file used to be four vendors.

PandaPanel

Owned panel, 47 direct suppliers, vetted experts. Every source traceable.

Sources

Quality control

Identity, behaviour and semantics checked on every complete.

How QC works

PandaScope

Feasibility, CPI, conversion and spend on one screen, live.

Dashboard

PandaStudio

18 question types, branching, quotas and 28 languages.

Builder

Quality control

Dirty data is rarely malice.
It is a missing gate.

Three gates on every complete. Fail any one and it stops there — at our cost, with the reason written into your report.

Identity

Cross-referenced identity, employment and device signals. Multi-account clusters are frozen.

Behaviour

Question timing and consistency modelling catches straightliners at submit.

Semantics

Open-ends reviewed for AI cadence, drift and zero information — with a readable reason.

See the QC pipeline
QC engine · live feedTHR 0.82
R-48192 · open-end: "why did you switch"Pass0.94
R-48193 · text restates the stemReject0.31
R-48194 · 11 questions in 92 secondsReview0.58
R-48195 · device linked to 3 accountsReject0.12
R-48196 · matrix consistencyPass0.88
R-48197 · open-end semantically emptyReject0.27
This wave: 37 / 1,321 rejectedCost carried by us

Audiences

The people you need to ask —
we probably already know them.

People who can answer for themselves

Identity-verified individuals with a purchase history. Attributes carry a last-collected date, and stale profiles are down-weighted automatically.

6.2MReachable people
1,860+Attributes
3.2hMedian start
< 8%Repeat rate (90d)
Audience detail

Targeting attributes

AgeGenderCity tierRegion / DMAHousehold incomeChildren by ageTenureCar ownershipBrand affinityPurchase frequency

Comparison

Panel is slow. Traffic is rough.

Not everyone should buy from us. So here is the comparison, laid out to argue with.

CapabilityPANDAOPINIONSelf-serve + QCTraditional panelAd-network traffic
Live audience size and priceYesNoPartial
Sources compared side by sideYesNoNo
Semantic review on open-endsYesAdd-onNo
Cross-project de-duplicationYesManualNo
Every rejection documentedYesOn requestNo
Pay as you go, no minimumYesNoYes
Median start, consumer sample3 hours2–5 days1 day
Export and API deliveryYesTicketLimited

What teams say

Nobody was talked into it.
They just never went back.

A tracker wave used to sit in a queue for four days. Now we lock the questionnaire in the morning and read results the next day.

Elena Marsh

Head of Consumer Insight · Northwind

It tells you whether the data is usable before you have to ask. Quality score, rejection reasons, supplier performance — one view.

Linda Zhou

Research Director · Cloudline

B2B decision-makers are the hardest audience there is. Their verification was stricter than our own CRM.

Marcus Reid

Research Manager · Harbor Bank

Start your first project

Brief it today. Work with usable data tomorrow.

$500 in sample credit on your first order. No minimums, no contracts, no platform seat fees. If you would rather have someone run it with you, one of our researchers will field the whole study.

No credit card 14-day refund window Export to SPSS / Excel / CSV

FAQ

A few things worth
confirming first.

Not covered here? Email support@pandaopinion.com — you will hear back within two hours during business hours.

Talk to us
Minimum spend, or platform fees?

Neither. You pay only for valid completes at the CPI quoted at launch. Your first order includes $500 in sample credit.

Can I keep my current questionnaire platform?

Yes. Paste your survey link and add four callback parameters. Qualtrics, Decipher, Voxco, SurveyMonkey, Typeform and custom builds all work.

What counts as a valid complete?

One that passes all three quality layers and satisfies your routing. Rejects are not invoiced, and every reason is itemised in your report.

My audience is very small. Can you still find them?

Low-incidence groups go through supplemental recruitment, usually in 5–12 business days. You get a feasibility range up front, not a promise.